Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aiura Nagato

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 19:32, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aiura Nagato

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Japan/Historical people. The cited source does not support the sentences attributed to it. A quick search of Google books shows no support. --Ansei (talk) 16:19, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 May 5. Snotbot t • c » 16:41, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. czar · · 19:31, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. czar · · 19:31, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. czar · · 19:31, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:38, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only source since the article was created in 2008 appears non-applicable. Appears extremely difficult to verify otherwise. --Pusillanimous (talk•contribs) 14:27, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment At the library, I found one entry in a reliable biographical dictionary and have added it to the article. I have not, however, been able to find other sources so far. Michitaro (talk) 12:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No indication of notability. Bueller 007 (talk) 02:38, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.