Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Ekhwa (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Epeefleche, you can speedy renom this too if you wish but I suggest giving it some time. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:58, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Al Ekhwa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lack of notability. I cannot find sufficient evidence of RS news articles/books on the band -- or of the member who has a wp article -- after having performed a wp:before search. Epeefleche (talk) 20:17, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 12:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 12:39, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as "one of the most popular musicians and singers of Bahrain".[1] Phil Bridger (talk) 15:45, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure if that one comment, apparently subjective (how did they measure popularity?), from the only ref supporting the entire article, is sufficient. But I'm happy to agree to whatever the consensus view turns out to be on that.--Epeefleche (talk) 06:43, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.