Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexia Osborne
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:40, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Alexia Osborne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Actress with just a single credit in an as yet unreleased film. No significant references that would pass the WP:GNG; fails WP:ENTERTAINER, no multiple major roles, no awards etc. Tassedethe (talk) 00:53, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. The sources in the article do not deal with the subject in enough depth to establish notability, and I could not find sources that could. --Slon02 (talk) 04:05, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:ENT MehranVB ☻talk 08:08, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete child actress with one "upcoming" film as her career. Short career fails WP:ENT. Lack of coverage fails WP:GNG. This one is waaaaaaaaaaay too soon. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 19:46, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect to movie title, this is a no-brainer.--Milowent • talkblp-r 23:44, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.