Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Gholami

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice towards recreation when the meet the relevant guideline. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:10, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Gholami

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator on the grounds that he has played for the Iranian U-20 National team. However, WP:NSPORT explicitly excluded youth international caps as a source of notability. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:22, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:22, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following articles for the same reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:44, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 23:21, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom doesn't meet WP:GNG Kabirat (talk) 06:38, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - fail WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 09:27, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom. The creator can keep a copy of these articles somewhere (maybe as a subpage on his userspace) since appearing in a single match during current season will make them notable.Farhikht (talk) 10:27, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.