Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aloke Kumar Sen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:TOOSOON and COI concerns. If anyone wishes to write a new, neutral and non-promotional (preferably COI-free) article when more sources become available, they may do so. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  13:25, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aloke Kumar Sen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only reliable source that I could find about him is already included in the article (the only source). Fails notability criteria for singers, any bio, and the WP:GNG as well. —usernamekiran(talk) 13:57, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:22, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:22, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 14:07, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete one source is way below what is needed to show a musician is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:54, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:28, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Searches found some other reliable sources, such as [1] and [2]. Whether they would be enough to construct a reasonably complete and balanced biography or whether it is WP:TOOSOON in his career is open to debate.

Either way, the existing promotional article, even after being slashed in half, is rife with the WP:SPA's peacock language: popular, famous, one of the best, versatile, gift, and standout; only the last of which is attributed (to a newspaper for which he is an occasional columnist, so maybe not the most objective source). Very little is sourced. WP:TNT applies. No prejudice against recreation via a fundamental rewrite, but I strongly suggest waiting until additional reliably sourced information is available, and letting it be written by an editor with no WP:COI. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:44, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:TOOSOON is concerning. D4iNa4 (talk) 18:50, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.