Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AppleIIGo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 10:54, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AppleIIGo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. This was prodded in 2012 by User:Mr.BlackHole, unfortunately under an invalid rationale ("This is a very small article.") anf then unfortunately declined by User:Nthep who while correctly noting that being a stub is no reason for deletion should also consider the fact that spam like this should be simply speedied, which is what an admin should do to save us all time. Now we have to deal with it here. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:38, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I'm actually not finding anything better and, if it wasn't software is not included in A7, this is actually speedy given there's no claims of significance. SwisterTwister talk 16:30, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 14:27, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 14:41, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.