Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arachnode.net

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. without prejudice to recreate if suitable reliable sources should be found at a future date. If the creator wants it userfied, contact me. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 19:06, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arachnode.net

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not entirely sure that this article meets the notability criteria required for inclusion set out at WP:WEB and WP:N, although I've been sent an email by the creator setting out several reasons it might be notable. I'd appreciate input from the wider community, as my own mind is undecided and I'm not an expert on the subject. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 16:23, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question: What makes a page like this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MnoGoSearch suitable for Wikipedia, but not arachnode.net? Both are crawlers, but mine is in a different language. What can I do to improve the article so that it may stay? :D 98.232.24.184 (talk) 20:47, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not notable. To the author - the easiest way to get the article to stay is to get people to write about it in notable publications. You're right about MnoGoSearch - that article could be a candidate for deletion as well. Yaron K. (talk) 03:04, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Well, thanks for restoring it so I could copy the markup. :) Guess I will work on getting notable links to AN. If by chance, you have a change of heart it would be most appreciated. Mikeanderson12 (talk) 01:53, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.