Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arping
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 17:46, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- Arping (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Although this topic has some "How to's" written about it, It is not WP:NOTABLE as a "how to" dosn't really provide notability. No articles are written about it or its history. CombatWombat42 (talk) 19:35, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:11, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:11, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - Per WP:NSOFTWARE. Many printings and third-party literature exist for this software tool. See this source, as well as this one. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 10:28, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - widely available, used e.g. by NetworkManager --HelpUsStopSpam (talk) 22:37, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:29, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:29, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - The program and concept are not fiction, they exist and are used. The poor quality of the article is not a criterion to deletion. In fact, I see no genuine reason for deletion. Kbrose (talk) 17:28, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.