Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aryaan Arora

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 06:34, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aryaan Arora

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP doesn't seem to meet WP:NACTOR. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and New Jersey. Shellwood (talk) 08:05, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
deletewith fire this is absolute paid for nonsensical vanity spam with no reliable sources to be found anywhere. PRAXIDICAE💕 12:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It has all the relevant references for the public figure we don’t think so it should get delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmpwork (talk • contribs) 12:15, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Who is "we"? Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 12:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The References are not paid it has been taken from google itself from highly readable source new sites — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmpwork (talk • contribs) 14:35, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:03, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:44, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. "This article is part of a featured content programme", IWMBuzz is likely not reliable for notability purposes, this one is from "Brand Connect", this is an interview, this one is from "Brand Voice", and so on and so forth. The idea that "The References are not paid" is simply not correct, and my assessment is the same as Praxidicae's: the available sources don't cut it. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:08, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.