Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asciiporn
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:34, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Asciiporn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No third-party sources that indicate any coverage, significance, importance, or notability. — Timneu22 · talk 18:57, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to ASCII porn.—S Marshall T/C 22:13, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Not a redirect. The author created a disambig page; these topics aren't even close to the same thing. — Timneu22 · talk 22:41, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I know it's not the same thing, but it's a plausible typo for the notable topic.—S Marshall T/C 07:41, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Not a redirect. The author created a disambig page; these topics aren't even close to the same thing. — Timneu22 · talk 22:41, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree: "No third-party sources that indicate any coverage, significance, importance, or notability."
The following edit should also be reverted since it references Asciiporn if Asciiporn is deleted. this edit Javaweb (talk) 05:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Javaweb[reply]
- Delete - Non-notable software. And Asciiporn (disambiguation) as well. Kuguar03 (talk) 05:47, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Update for closing admin, if this is deleted, the following should also be deleted:
- this edit
- Asciiporn (disambiguation)
- The hatnote on ASCII porn
- — Timneu22 · talk 10:43, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable software. (Though I think there's no harm in this edit; just unlink it if this article is deleted. bobrayner (talk) 22:40, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.