Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baby Teeth (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 12:08, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Baby Teeth (band)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Very poorly sourced article about a band that appears to have achieved nothing of note - the one source is an archive of a page on the band's website. There is a short AllMusic bio[1] but I can’t find the multiple, in-depth, reliable, independent sources needed to meet GNG. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:03, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:03, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The article badly needs to be cleaned up, but the band has been covered at least twice in the reliable Paste magazine: [2], [3]; plus respected city newspapers: [4], [5]; and several lesser-known but robust local publications: [6], [7]. That is enough for an introductory stub article, and the current state of the article does not reflect the band's coverage. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:08, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: in addition to the sources regarding the band above, there's at least one review of their second album [8] and several reviews of their third [9], [10], [11], [12]. They may not have been around long, but they certainly didn't go unnoticed by the music press. Richard3120 (talk) 19:14, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Update page with sources presented here by doomsdayer520 and Richard3120 - 41.6.39.92 (talk) 00:28, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per sources mentioned above. /Julle (talk) 10:36, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.