Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Dronkers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G5: creation by a banned or blocked user in violation of ban or block. Beritagsier is both a paid editor and a CU-confirmed sock of Altutmir. Yunshui  09:19, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Dronkers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not independently notable, i tried to redirect to the company article as all the sources are about the company and notability is not inherited. So suggesting a delete and then redirect. Praxidicae (talk) 16:00, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:39, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:39, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
see WP:NOTINHERITED also revenge noms look real bad. Just an FYI. Praxidicae (talk) 21:04, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I have seen WP:NOTINHERITED and it does not apply here. FYI, you have been stalking my contributions. Beritagsier (talk) 21:10, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
nominations should be about the content, not contributor, so I'll expect you can provide diffs to substantiate that, Beritagsier? Praxidicae (talk) 21:11, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Message me on my talk page. This is not the correct place. Beritagsier (talk) 21:13, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That second link is for a site called cannabus.de. That does not sound like an independent reliable source.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 14:00, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ok yea. But look at this book though [10]. Dronkers is profiled in it, and he is portrayed as very important in the field of Cannabis seeds. Mottezen (talk) 19:04, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Meh. It's something, but it's more about the store than it is about him. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 19:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 05:00, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The subject of the article attained notability through the importance and grandeur of his company. Furthermore, the article passed WP:BASIC. Also, the search with the Russian keywords "Бен Дронкерс" and "Дронкерс, Бен" brought up a good amount of news articles that cover the subject in detail. Israell (talk) 08:27, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:15, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is neither paid nor spam and the claim that it has no significant coverage is ridiculous. Have you done WP:BEFORE? I see you are obsessed with paid-editing but please stop random guessing. Not everyone is a paid editor.Beritagsier (talk) 21:56, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I done a very well research on both the notability and paid editing and I have convincing evidence to support my claim. GSS💬 03:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Beritagsier: can you provide those sources? GSS💬 03:31, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Electiondata: all these sources are passing mentions so, please explain how they meet the requirements set by WP:GNG? GSS💬 03:30, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.