Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobcad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:32, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bobcad

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN company, fails the GNG, WP:CORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. No coverage in reliable sources found (even under the company's correct name of "BobCAD-CAM"), except for namedrops and casual mentions. It exists; I just can't find evidence that it's notable. Notability tagged for over a decade.

NB: should reliable sourcing surface, I strongly recommend a page move to the company's correct name. Ravenswing 21:16, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Ravenswing 21:16, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Ravenswing 21:16, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Computer-aided_design#Software. This doesn't seem notable enough for an article, but it might be worth mentioning in the list of Cad software in that article. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:38, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:18, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:14, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP. I don't see much point in redirecting to a list article, is that normal? HighKing⁺⁺ 20:27, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not many sources available, WP:SIGCOV QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 01:04, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.