Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Briar Navigator

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:48, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Briar Navigator

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cursory search turns up no reliable secondary sources, no indication of meeting WP:PRODUCT. PROD contested by page author, who then added promotional and copyvio text. Potential COI. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 16:38, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 16:39, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This page was created to provide a link on Briar Navigator from table of Technical_analysis_software and doesn't include any commercial information. It was made to provide Wikipedia's readers a possibility to find out all the opportunities at a glance and ability to compare with other table's participants. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Den Williamson (talk • contribs) 17:39, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane ^talk 01:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete. The article is very weak for sure. Not one source/reference on the article. Surprised it wasn't speedy deleted. Let's not waste our time on this one, not a single source in Google News, ever. Ferrari250 (talk) 19:02, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.