Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Browns-Lions rivalry
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 02:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Browns-Lions rivalry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and has POV issues because what does establish a rivalry. The article makes no assertion, just lists the games the two teams have played against one another.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. ...William 22:25, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. ...William 22:25, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. ...William 22:25, 16 February 2013 (UTC) ...William 22:25, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The Browns and Lions do not have a rivalry. Simply being among the oldest of NFL teams does not mean they are rivals. This article developed off of a premise that is WP:SYNTH and WP:OR. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:01, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The Browns were actually in the All-America Football Conference originally, not the NFL and that franchise moved to Baltimore, with a new expansion franchise adopting the historic name and colors. There is no "Browns-Lions Rivalry," although one might be able to sell me on a "Lions-Packers Rivalry" or a "Lions-Bears Rivalry." As such, not an encyclopedic topic, protracted competition between Random Team A and Random Team B in Random Sport X does not a notable topic make. Carrite (talk) 23:07, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is a historical rivalry and the two teams played in THREE nfl Championships in the 1950's if this shouldn't have an article that why should Bucs-Dolphins? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.187.63.104 (talk) 01:20, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no sources provided. I don't doubt that the games are played, but I do doubt that it is a "rivalry" so to speak. If the original editor is overly enthusiastic, go with userfication of the article and bring it back when it's ready.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:26, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No sports rivalry is inherently notable per WP:NRIVALRY. A sports rivalry should should satisfy the general notability guidelines per WP:GNG for inclusion as a stand-alone article topic; GNG requires that the subject must be discussed in a material way in multiple, independent, reliable sources. The media coverage of this "rivalry" does not satisfy those guidelines for inclusion. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:30, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.