Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Choctaw Nation Mississippi River Clan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Neutrality^talk 00:20, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Choctaw Nation Mississippi River Clan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources available, WP:NOTSOAPBOX TransporterMan (TALK) 23:53, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I have found no reliable sources verifying the existence, let alone the notability of this group. Drmies (talk) 00:21, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note per Wikipedia:CANVAS#Appropriate_notification, I am giving notice that I have invited Heiro, Uyvsdi, and User:67.235.129.179 to participate in this discussion in light of their substantial participation in the Choctaw Nation of Florida discussion. I would have also invited the main "keep" participant in that discussion but he, GregJackP, has been indefinitely blocked. — TransporterMan (TALK) 13:34, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non notable group with no sourcing to back up claims, article consists completely of WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. He iro 13:24, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just did a little more digging over the article and some G searches. How has this article not been deleted sooner? Even if they could be proven to exist, which I've found nothing but our article and mirrors, they would still fail WP:GNG. He iro 13:49, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Author has a conflict of interest, the article is clearly self-promotional, organization has not established notability, and reliable, secondary sources cannot be found. -Uyvsdi (talk) 16:27, 27 May 2011 (UTC)Uyvsdi[reply]
Delete w/o prj — if this is genuine, can be recreated once verified. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 16:55, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.