Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Combining dimensions
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 15:43, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Combining dimensions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am unconvinced that "combining dimensions" is really a coherent concept as such. My own research has mainly come up with usage from data mining and database refactoring, which would possibly merit a redirect to Dimensionality reduction, but that has nothing to do with what is described in this unsourced stub. Felix QW (talk) 14:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Felix QW (talk) 14:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. This is just a phrase without any clear referent. But if we end up disambiguating or redirecting, one potential target would be Embedding#Topology_and_geometry or something like that, based on the content that's there now. Danstronger (talk) 14:31, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per above. PianoDan (talk) 18:29, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:TNT. There is definitely something to be said about visualizing high-dimensional data by somehow projecting to lower-dimensional spaces, but this article and its title are of no use in saying it. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The idea behind it is notable, but my search showed zero uptake for this particular name for it. Without any sourcing, even a redirect is unwarranted. Hence, delete. --
{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk}
17:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.