Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Courcelles (talk) 23:25, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced article that I stumbled upon via STiKi. Totally unencyclopedic and of unknown notability. Really unsalvageable in present form. Actually warrants speedy deletion but am nominating for deletion in recognition of its age and number of contributors, even though none of the contributors has apparently expended much effort into making this a Wikipedia article. Coretheapple (talk) 16:16, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn by nominator. I'm persuaded by the references provided by other editors. The article does still need work, obviously. Coretheapple (talk) 13:54, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. Clearly notable subject. There are numerous books written about, or based on, the system;
- Together with Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE) in Social Science, Sagar
- Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE) in English Communicative, Ravi, Gulati
- Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation: Teachers' Handbook for Primary Stage, National Council of Educational Research and Training
- Academic Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation in Social Science X, Singhal
- Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation in Present Education System
- Solutions to Academic Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation in Hindi X B, Banga
and many academic papers;
- "Feasibility study of continuous comprehensive assessment of primary students", Rajput, Tewari, Kumar
- "Continuous and comprehensive evaluation: A study of teachers’ perception", Pooja
- "Continuous and comprehensive evaluation: Redefining the role of teachers", Aggarwal, Bhalla
- "A study implementation of continuous and comprehensive evaluation in upper primary schools of Kerala", Kothari, Thomas
- "Towards Positing a Paradigm for Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation in Social Sciences", Mandal
- "Continuously and Comprehensively Evaluating Children", Nawani
- "Attitude of Student Teachers towards Continuous Comprehensive Evaluation With Reference To Gender, Caste and Habitat", Singh, Patel, Desai
- "A philosophical study: continuous and comprehensive evaluation", Parkash et al
- Practices of teachers' in implemeting continuous and comprehensive evaluation - an exploratory study", Chopra, Bhatia
There are many more. Not to mention all the news items; [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. SpinningSpark 00:55, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep likely if there is good coverage about this. SwisterTwister talk 22:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —SpacemanSpiff 08:18, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Keep and per WP:SNOW: certainly not a candidate for speedy deletion since no CSD criteria fit. Subject gets overwhelmingly significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, and notability to pass WP:GNG is unquestioned. Below I add just ~10 {{cite book}}s. A book search is mandatory WP:BEFORE nominating for AfD. Pinging Coretheapple for their reconsideration. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 13:28, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
|
- Comment Sure, I'm OK with withdrawing it, given that references have been supplied. Coretheapple (talk) 13:54, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.