Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Courcelles (talk) 23:25, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article that I stumbled upon via STiKi. Totally unencyclopedic and of unknown notability. Really unsalvageable in present form. Actually warrants speedy deletion but am nominating for deletion in recognition of its age and number of contributors, even though none of the contributors has apparently expended much effort into making this a Wikipedia article. Coretheapple (talk) 16:16, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

and many academic papers;

There are many more. Not to mention all the news items; [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. SpinningSpark 00:55, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —SpacemanSpiff 08:18, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Extended content
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.