Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coolsville (Scooby-Doo)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Scooby-Doo. Sandstein 20:45, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Coolsville (Scooby-Doo)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Even the sources in the article aren't significant mentions of the fictional town. One could argue for the notability of the games that are mentioned, but not for the town. Sjö (talk) 17:56, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:58, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:59, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep most Scooby Doo subjects are notable and this article is being improved with extra references, its not as if its a BLP, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:27, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Subjects are only notable if there have received a significant amount of coverage from third-party, reliable sources. If you want to construct a stronger argument, then please provide sources for this. Aoba47 (talk) 01:41, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Scooby-Doo given the lack of coverage. Aoba47 (talk) 01:43, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Scooby-Doo as non-notable fancruft._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 06:39, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Scooby-Doo. No evidence of independendent notability. \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 20:37, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.