Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cradit
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 23:48, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A misspelling of credit? --Dangherous 22:34, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Dictdef but has no printed citation of usage, so appears to be nonsensical. (aeropagitica) 22:42, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Sometimes used as a last name. In this context, looks like nonsense. - Trysha (talk) 22:47, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This word is unheard of. SycthosTalk 23:45, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Wiktionary would take an article on the proper noun at Cradit, but this isn't such an article. This is a protologism, possibly coined as an attack on someone with that surname, with Wikipedia being mis-used to promote it. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. There are no people with this family name in Wikipedia, so there is no reason for a name disambiguation article. Delete. Uncle G 05:16, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Protologism. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:22, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.