Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CyberTracker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 01:50, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CyberTracker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A difficult one to check out but it does not seem to meet WP:ORG. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 09:28, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:38, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:38, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:39, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:39, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Passes WP:ORGDEPTH. Source examples: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] (Time magazine article reprinted on Cybertracker website, scroll down), [7]. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:34, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 16:50, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 14:45, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Northamerica1000's links conclusively show this product's notability. And here's another one: [8], from the Australian Govt. —SMALL JIM 10:49, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.