Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWTFYWWI
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 11:31, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- DWTFYWWI (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I have not been able to find a reliable secondary source for this term. (WP:V) Marasmusine (talk) 18:05, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Personally, I think this article is cool, but if you disagree, then go ahead and DWTFYWWI. See if I care. :p Tisane talk/stalk 19:35, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Touché! Marasmusine (talk) 08:34, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Week Delete - Agree with the nom, lack of secondary source for this term. Codf1977 (talk) 19:38, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 01:19, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per A3 Fleet Command (talk) 07:13, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm going to report this to the Alliance Against A3 Abuse. Tisane talk/stalk 15:04, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Wow! It's nice to see that I haven't lost my touch as an abusive Wikipedian. (Yes, sarcasm intended!) Fleet Command (talk) 22:38, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - WP:NEO or WP:HOAX: the article's only link says "I created this as a parody". SteveStrummer (talk) 17:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Indeed, the only link describes this license as a GPL parody. It has 3 clauses all of which are funny (check them out!) but that does not mean it deserves a wikipedia article. Pxtreme75 (talk) 20:59, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.