Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Da Inphamus Amadeuz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 19:15, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Da Inphamus Amadeuz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP article about a disk jockey and rapper that lacks reliable sources and fails notability WP:MUSICBIO. Most sources are self published sources WP:SELFPUBLISH, own web site and sites like datpiff.com, rhapsody.com, ilike.com (partnership with Myspace Music). Claims he was featured with notable musicans are sourced with a you tube video that looks like a fraud. The creator of this articel has a serious COI. Ben Ben (talk) 16:24, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -The fact that it lacks reliable third-party sources is a fatal flaw. Looked on google news and did not find any sources. illogical pie^{(eat me)} 20:41, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 14:10, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not turning up reliable source coverage. Qrsdogg (talk) 20:44, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - vanity page with mostly unserious unencyclopedic content. No RS to be found, and fails WP:BAND. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:09, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable, per RSs.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:06, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 17:36, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.