Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Winn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:40, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Winn

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Passing mentions; oh so many passing mentions. Helpfully excerpted in the refs - and yes, these are the only mentions of his name in these sources. Plus one HuffPo interview. Independent, in-depth coverage is sorely lacking here. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:51, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:51, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:53, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:53, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:55, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:55, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:55, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:57, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree with nom. The present sourcing is, to be blunt, insulting, and there's nothing better out there. PK650 (talk) 00:05, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Some passing mentions, but nothing substantive to show WP:NACTOR is satisfied or to support a WP:BLP. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:45, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I, too, am struggling to find reliable, in-depth coverage of the subject. (On a side note, none of his roles, in my opinion, would go towards WP:NACTOR either; he is generally quite far down the pecking order.) Dflaw4 (talk) 03:18, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Per nom. not enough coverage to be notable. Alex-h (talk) 13:02, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.