Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Singh
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:51, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Deepak Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An IP suggested that this is a hoax on the article's talk page, though it seems that "Young Turks Media" does have a website. However, I can't find significant coverage in reliable sources for this purported filmmaker. Tim Song (talk) 05:05, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Fails notability. Delete. There's no significant coverage of the person, based on reliable sources. —Dark 05:11, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:30, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Deepak Singh[reply]
- Delete. Before we get to discussion on notability, this one fails verifiability. I'm sympathetic to the IP comments on the talk page, the ELs that I went through don't even mention this person. —SpacemanSpiff 07:08, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:21, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no coverage in reliable sources. I, too, see verifiability issues. the persom may actually exist. This article quotes him. But the article itself is highly suspect. This link from the external links of the article makes no mention of him. -- Whpq (talk) 18:25, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a vanity page of someone who is (not yet) notable. BLPs required the highest quality sources. Bearian (talk) 21:23, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.