Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorothy Kulisek
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Lear's Fool 13:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Dorothy Kulisek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I find no evidence of Kulisek being on permanent display in the Orsay (via their own published catalogue, see [1]), no matches in GBooks or GNews and the only relevant matches in Google appear circular. The article fails WP:V and fails to make a verifiable case against WP:ARTIST. The article was PRODded in 2009 and it was rejected on the basis that sources might be found, however considering the continuing lack of sources it seems unlikely that this will be addressed in the near future. Fæ (talk) 11:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 11:01, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence of notabillity, no evidence she actually is in the Orsay which is the only thing here that might have established notabillity.--ThePaintedOne (talk) 16:04, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. See comments by nominator. I can find nothing about her other than the Sun-by-the-Sea web site. Fails WP:ARTIST. --Crunch (talk) 13:38, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.