Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dream (YouTuber)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 23:29, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dream (YouTuber)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Many references are provided for this article, but several of them are Youtube and Twitter, which are not reliable sources. As far as I can tell, none of the others cover the subject in any kind of detail. Fails WP:BIO ♟♙ (talk) 20:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:07, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:07, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:09, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This article has been reference-bombed with low-quality sources, but the nominator is correct that many of them are unreliable. If it says that his real name is Clay, then that means that his real name is unknown, since he probably has a Western name, which further means that we don't have a clue on how to verify anything except famous for being famous. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:29, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just a copypaste move of the previously declined draft at Draft:Dream (YouTuber), agree with the above that this has been ref bombed with crappy sources. If this article were to theoretically be kept, it would need a histmerge from that draft. Looks like all of the creator's articles are now nominated for CSD/AfD/PROD as well. Dylsss^{(talk • contribs)} 22:23, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Dream is probably the biggest minecraft youtuber at the moment, but he still doesn't satisfy the GNG for coverage as one would expect for an article. No prejudice against recreating the article in the future if they get more substantial coverage. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:37, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above comments on reliability. I say this as a fan of Dream, but this is simply a case of WP:TOOSOON; I suspect that as his channel continues to grow he will receive more substantial coverage, so no prejudice against a later recreation. Sincerely, Ovinus (talk) 19:07, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Ovinus. Too soon and still doesn't pass GNG. With no prejudice on a later creation. Chlod (say hi!) 16:17, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Vandalism has been reverted, and semi-protection has been requested for remainder of AFD. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:19, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Barely found anything about him aside from his activities in MineCraft. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The lack of reliable sources makes this article fail to establish notability. The sources are the only problem though so do not delete the draft. Also like Ovinus, I am a Dream fan and this is too soon. OcelotCreeper (talk) 19:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.