Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleven 59
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 14:45, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Eleven 59 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable, no reliable sources found after search of this students band. Fails as per Wikipedia:Notability (music) overall. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 14:09, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete (probably speedy) - no real indication that any sources could exist for anything the band did. The phrase "The band disbanded in 1993 after 7 years of frustration, trying to get a recording contract" is telling - even Dumpy's Rusty Nuts managed a few (non-charting) singles. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:26, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - not speedy - assertion of notability is plausible, but can't be sourced easily. Bearian (talk) 18:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - I'm not finding coverage that would help to show that this group meets WP:GNG or WP:BAND. Gongshow talk 20:38, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
