Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Empty Clip Studios
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Unanimous Keep. Foxy Loxy Pounce! 11:41, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Empty Clip Studios (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
non-notable games studio which has released one game which itself isn't particularly notable yet (and may never actually be notable) the studio fails WP:CORP, WP:V, and WP:RS. Speedy declined on the basis that someone has created an article for the game and apparently that counts as an assertion of importance/significance for the companyJasynnash2 (talk) 15:33, 7 October 2008 (UTC) Jasynnash2 (talk) 15:33, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep as it is getting coverage per WP:GNG... some trivial, but some in-depth: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]... and more at this search. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 16:47, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Sourced, Wikified, added EL's Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 01:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 18:11, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, kurykh 06:38, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the sourcing provided by MQS. Icewedge (talk) 07:08, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as it's been sourced. If no further verifiable information can be found, though, a merge might be suitable. Randomran (talk) 03:50, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the sources found above. MuZemike (talk) 16:23, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.