Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erlend Sørhøy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Erlend Sørhøy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and the spirit of WP:NFOOTBALL, his professional play consisting of 22 minutes. I know that the appearances weren't that long ago, and that his career is ongoing, but that is on the fourth tier in Norway, a full three tiers below professionalism. Most of his career years were spent on the fourth tier, so there is nothing remote to meeting any guideline, except for those 22 minutes. Geschichte (talk) 20:27, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:30, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:30, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:30, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:33, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:54, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Fails GNG. No Great Shaker (talk) 04:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Fails GNG.4meter4 (talk) 19:53, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.