Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EvoX (BIOS)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 15:36, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

EvoX (BIOS)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 23:34, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 01:02, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find significant coverage of the software. Jujutacular ^T · C 05:25, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Jujutacular ^T · C 05:25, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Question. Do we have an article on Xbox mods? It could be merged there? Pcap ping 05:32, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Theres Xbox softmods, but it's unreferenced... Jujutacular ^T · C 05:49, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Well, that article had some links in it but they got removed after they went dead. I have no idea what constitutes a reliable source for this kind of info. Obviously not going to be found in any books as that would violate DMCA. Pcap ping 07:38, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Suggestion. Merge it with the main Evolution-X article and redirect to that article. Done. Recommend deletion of page and redirection (I dunno how to do it).

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SilkTork *^YES! 16:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, then redirect per the above performed merge. Though the content remains unsourced and sloppily written in the new article that is not under discussion here. Miami33139 (talk) 21:57, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This almost reads like a how-to guide but in any case is not sourced, nor is it notable. There is nothing to merge here in my honest opinion. JBsupreme (talk) 22:19, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.