Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fancyber

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:46, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fancyber

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable app. Most android apps also do not fit the criteria for notability in Wikipedia.

5 of the sources cited are not sources that can be verified but instead quotes from primary source.

The remaining sources are all from the company website.

Fails WP:GNG with an absence of reliable, independent sources to indicate notability. Flat Out let's discuss it 11:02, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, badly written piece of spam for an app created and run by a 16-year-old. Literally every reference goes to a primary source and according to Google has less than zero notability. I wouldn't mind if it got speedied for spam and the author blocked for doing nothing but advertising. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 13:59, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.