Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feeders (film)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:04, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Feeders (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable film Orange Mike | Talk 05:01, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Per [1], [2], [3], [4], and [5]. Joe Chill (talk) 14:14, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Possible Keep: even though this film may be put into the "it's so bad, it's good" catagory, it now seems to have attracted something of a cult status. There is a fair bit of info out there about it too. (Mr Real Natural (talk) 05:24, 13 November 2009 (UTC))[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:09, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Per Joe Chill and Mr. Real Natural's observations. Plus, the film and its creators were cited in this book: [6]. Warrah (talk) 03:56, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Coverage in reliable sources seems to be established. — Hunter Kahn (c) 07:13, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
