Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FireIRC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 00:53, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FireIRC

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A quick search on google books found no mentions of this. A google search for a review turned up empty too. I initially prodded this, but it turned out it had been prodded in the past by someone else, and the prod removed by the WP:SPA that created this article. The other editor that expanded this article, User:Mmanley, is the owner of the company that develops this software (according to his user page) Pcap ping 11:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 11:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because the subject is not notable. 58.170.83.117 (talk) 13:10, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 17:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - can't find good references independent of the publisher. Seems like spam to me. While we are addressing this, please check out User:Mmanley/Userboxes/fireirc Racepacket (talk) 19:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't find significant coverage of the software. Jujutacular ^T · C 19:38, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I believe that I can trust if PCAP says something in this subject area is not notable it most likely is not, but I too checked for sources through the usual means (Google News Archives, Google Books search) and came up empty handed. JBsupreme (talk) 08:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails to meet WP:N. Majorly talk 23:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.