Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Floppyfw (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. bibliomaniac 1 5 02:21, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Floppyfw

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY and has been tagged as such, unresolved, for 12 years. 2017 AfD came to no consensus - hopefully we can now, whichever way. Boleyn (talk) 14:52, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I tend to agree, but I found that there are more of these distro's that aren't notable enough for a standalone article. Might a good idea to merge them all together? See MuLinux, tomsrtbt and Coyote Linux. Streepjescode (talk) 16:01, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

user:Streepjescode, I think there are a lot of others that are non-notable. With this one though, as there was no consensus to delete before, I think it might detract if others were thrown in too. Boleyn (talk) 16:09, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it might not be notable for a standalone article. But if the information if verifiable, then a generic article could be made about small Linux distro's that fit on a floppy because all three together they might meet WP:GNG. Streepjescode (talk) 16:12, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

keep Mostly per comments in the previous AfD. I don't understand what's wrong with the first 3 listed sources for this to be deemed non-notable. I've just went ahead and removed the {{notability}} tag. SD0001 (talk) 13:03, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

keep changed my view based on previous comment, I'm also voting keep. Streepjescode (talk) 12:58, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.