Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel of Urantia
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:57, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gabriel of Urantia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Complete promotional fluff; basically my reasons for nomination are the same as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CosmoPop. wizzito | say hello! 02:26, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. wizzito | say hello! 02:26, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. wizzito | say hello! 02:26, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. wizzito | say hello! 02:26, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. wizzito | say hello! 02:26, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:06, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Strong Delete Fails WP:BIO. scope_creepTalk 12:44, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - The gentleman has spent at least 55 years as a tireless self-promoter (which by the way contradicts many of his own Christian principles), claiming to have invented entire genres while influencing millions. The article is dependent on "sources" that are largely reprinted PR announcements from his own organization, and some minor concert announcements. The article serves as little more than a biography written by himself or a few fans, and is better left to promotional sites where evidence doesn't matter. Verifiable evidence of his supposed widespread success and influence is severely lacking in significant and reliable music media sources. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:42, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.