Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goldbach (Tollense)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:32, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Goldbach (Tollense)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete - Only one sentence in the article. Don't really need an article about a river. It is already mentioned in List of rivers of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern so not needed to have a very small page telling you that a river is a river.Thursby16 (talk) 22:43, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Most rivers are notable, and this one can be expanded with reliable sources, for example the sources on the German Wiki. Current article is bad, but that isn't grounds for deletion. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:41, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Joseph2302. Yes, the sources in the German WP page seem to indicate notability. Being a one-sentence article is reason for a stub notice, not deletion.--Oakshade (talk) 01:02, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Named rivers are almost always going to be notable. This is the kind of basic stuff that should be in an encyclopedia. The German article indicates multiple sources. I respectfully suggest that the nom be withdrawn. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:01, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:00, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.