Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HI-TECH Software
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Microchip Technology. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 19:23, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- HI-TECH Software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company, article lacks substantial coverage in third-party press. CitizenNeutral (talk) 07:08, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 18:01, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:22, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:23, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:23, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and consider Merge with Microchip Technology (acquirer). Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:48, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- merge the proposed merge seems reasonable; it's our usual practice. DGG ( talk ) 20:49, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:07, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Microchip Technology - notability insufficient for separate article, but enough content for a section in the merge target.Dialectric (talk) 01:58, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.