Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harberger Tax (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn; didn't realize had a recent debate. (non-admin closure) ZimZalaBim talk 18:24, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Harberger Tax (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Random, obscure tax proposal. Not linked to by any other article; lacks importance as a concept. ZimZalaBim talk 02:15, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:59, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- It's a proposal made by multiple economists, including in a book that is most likely notable (Radical Markets: Uprooting Capitalism and Democracy for a Just Society). I'd support a merge, but there isn't just one good merge target given these factors. Notability does not depend on popularity. Also worth noting that this recently survived AfD, with editors able to find significant coverage of the subject. I don't see how the circumstances have changed since. Elli (talk | contribs) 18:18, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.