Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hexagonal (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Since the reslisting no further discussion has taken place, and as such there's no consensus for deletion. If you wish to further discuss, please take it to DRV. If an admin disagrees, feel free to revert. (non-admin closure) Dusti^*poke* 18:18, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hexagonal (album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musical release. No evidence of charting, awards or independent in depth coverage. PROD removed by IP without improvement to the article. I'm not finding anything reliable in google, but I don't read Korean and the name is pretty generic. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:29, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - see Korean article. all songs ranked South Korean official music chart and also album ranked 1. We found "Leessang Hexagonal" in google. Just article need translation - 121.139.81.113 (talk) 20:36, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - the Korean article appears to have some sources, although the reliability of those can be disputed (I don't read Korean, or even speak it). I found a couple things searching for "Hexagonal Leessang", but once again, not sure of reliability. If not, redirect to Leessang. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 20:38, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 21:55, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 23:54, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly keep - notablity. Kanghuitari (talk) 09:53, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:53, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.