Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hubert Znajomski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SpinningSpark 00:32, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hubert Znajomski

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A county-level activist and notability refs are on county level. I do not think he is notable enough for wikipedia. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:22, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:38, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:38, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:38, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Being a leader of one county's local chapter of a national or international organization is not, in and of itself, grounds for a Wikipedia article. In reality, the most genuinely substantive notability claim being attempted here is that he wrote a book — but writers are also not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because their books are verifiable as existing, and still have to demonstrate the significance of their books by virtue of literary awards and/or critical reviews of the book in media. Nothing here demonstrates substantive nationalized significance at all, and with the sourcing split about 50/50 between primary sources that aren't support for notability at all and purely local human interest coverage in his own local media, he hasn't been shown to pass WP:GNG in lieu of having to have any notability claims that would pass an SNG. Bearcat (talk) 16:59, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable activist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:15, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.