Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idhasoft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:45, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Idhasoft

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject doesn't appear to have significant coverage in multiple secondary, independent and reliable sources, therefore not meeting the standard of inclusion. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 09:03, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 09:03, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 09:03, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:47, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 02:57, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michig (talk) 10:20, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete wp:G11 as well as failing wp:N. Indeed the initial draft was nominated under G11 as one of the worst promotional pieces I've seen on Wikipedia, with the tag being removed (along with most of the article) by an IP user possibly under wp:NUKEANDPAVE. Neonchameleon (talk) 12:09, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete I'd like to know more about this company and Indian IT in general. They have an impressive website. If they can do everything they claimed in the first version that is impressive. But there seems to be very little evidence on the net. Employer review forums have former part-time employees complaining about low salaries and project management. The dead link says "The content you are looking for has been removed on legal advise." If the current content is all that's left, I don't see much value in keeping it. Better to go back to a red link in the one article that links to it. So, fail per WP:NCORP. – Margin1522 (talk) 06:10, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.