Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Illegal Danish: Super Snacks
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 12:49, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, non-entertaining gamecruft video, also 20 minutes, 7 seconds of my life that I'd like to have back. — Jun. 3, '06 [04:28] <freak|talk>
- I wouldn't necessarily call it "non-notable." It did win several first place awards in Xfire/Blizzard's movie contest. Also, the phrase "non-notable" seems a bit harsh. It would almost appear that you have a thing against "World of Warcraft" simply by your last few words. If anything, the page needs more information and/or to be expanded upon. There really isn't a need for deletion. - Zweibel 03 June, 2006, 00:57
- Note: this is the above user's second ever contribution to Wikipedia. Bwithh 19:37, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: For the record, I contributed greatly to the Leeroy Jenkins article, which was deemed notable, in no small part, due to being mentioned on Jeopardy!. — Jun. 4, '06 [06:15] <freak|talk>
- Delete So many World of Warcraft videos exist. So many. Many many. This many <----------------------------> (it's a ray, it goes on to infinity, man). -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 08:20, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. Perhaps not highly non-notable, but still pretty non-notable. I think the nominator had a thing against the video after watching it, not some kind of raging prejudice against WoW itselfBwithh 19:36, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep as the article for the movie preceding this was not deleted, and this won significantly more rewards and is much more widely known.Charlam 00 19:44, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.