Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infographics UK Ltd
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 11:08, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Infographics UK Ltd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- FireWatch (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Software company with no assertion of notability, reads like an advertisement. The article creator is a new user with a surprisingly firm grasp of reference formatting and article organization and his/her only contributions are to this page and its product FireWatch (software). Now, I'm not saying it's paid editing and/or self-promotion, but I think WP:DUCK applies. Axem Titanium (talk) 18:53, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: Adding FireWatch (software) to AFD since it suffers from all the same problems. Axem Titanium (talk) 18:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Rewrite if notable, but it doesn't seem to be. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 18:59, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 15:26, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Note that FireWatch (software) is also nominated for deletion herein. North America1000 17:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Note that FireWatch (software) is also nominated for deletion herein. North America1000 17:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Reads like an ad, no indication of notability. We're not the yellow pages, after all. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 20:30, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as nothing convincing for the needed solid independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:54, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.