Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inosanto Kali

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dan Inosanto. Unsourced material may not be merged into a WP:BLP, but may be merged from the history if sourced. Sandstein 06:44, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inosanto Kali

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An obscure martial art with insufficient third person evidence to justify such an article. Dwanyewest (talk) 15:14, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —Papaursa (talk) 22:19, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Dan Inosanto. Frankly, this article has nothing--no sources, no indication of notability, and no description of the art. It merely says it's a combination of Filipino martial arts and that Inosanto's had a lot of instructors. As written, its deletion would not be a loss. However, I have great respect for Dan Inosanto and wouldn't mind seeing this article rewritten and merged into his article. At the very least, the opening line of this article could be placed in Dan Inosanto. Papaursa (talk) 22:19, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:23, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or delete This article, as currently written, is a joke. However, my search turned up enough things to indicate this isn't complete fluff. I think merging it into Dan Inosanto is a good idea (or maybe it could be merged with Eskrima). Astudent0 (talk) 15:18, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Dan Inosanto. The founder is notable, but this article does not demonstrate the art's notability. Janggeom (talk) 13:45, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.