Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JMCAD
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 06:07, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- JMCAD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable unsourced software, not to mention terribly translated to the point of being almost unintelligible, prod declined without explanation by editor with likely COI based on username and developers name Jac16888 Talk 21:15, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Latest edits by a user with a clear conflict of interest have turned the page into a headache-inducing read. Previously the article was well written but relied on a single primary source and had no indication of notability. Total-MAdMaN (talk) 00:37, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Reverted to an earlier version. OSborn arfcontribs. 15:38, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per notability Fayedizard (talk) 13:19, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable per WP:GNG. ukexpat (talk) 14:33, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of notability. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 18:59, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
