Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Binn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 07:25, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Binn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Long-troubled article that, whether intended or not, looks more like a personal page, and my searches found nothing to suggest meaningful improvement here, here, here, here and here. Although he's accomplished quite a few things, he would probably be best mentioned elsewhere but there's no target (orphan). SwisterTwister talk 05:27, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:15, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; clearly non-notable. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 16:47, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:15, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:15, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 13:36, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; I can see nothing particularly notable about this business person. --Derek Andrews (talk) 13:56, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's been more than a year since I noted that the article was a puff piece with few sources. I had planned on stubbing this down to the two sentences that are reliably sourced, but figured I'd hold off until I could justify it by a year without the issue being addressed. But frankly, I don't even see notability here, so, delete. TJRC (talk) 18:45, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.