Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Palmer (ice hockey)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:46, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Joe Palmer (ice hockey) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 02:18, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete
based on ECHL and CHL, both of those are (well, one is now defunct but it wasn't at the time) mid-level minor league hockey teams. Wouldn't that qualify for the "second tier national league" bit given at WP:NHOCKEY? Add in the fact that he played goalie, with the cutoff being 90 games and between the ECHL and the CHL he played 92....well there's my logic. Willing to listen to comments though.Ah, there's the list. Delete, fails WP:NHOCKEY. RegistryKey(RegEdit) 03:29, 7 September 2016 (UTC) - Delete Neither of those leagues qualify under "second tier national league" given the list that is supplied. And just in case, the "award" that is listed in the bio is factual stats, but there is no award (or even recognition) from the IIHF for that.18abruce (talk) 16:16, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:NHOCKEY.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:01, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete another non-notable ice hockey player. A lot of the ones we have articles on were born in 1988, which may be why this year is the one we have the articles on the most people born in it.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:51, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.