Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kogbagidi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 11:32, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kogbagidi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don’t see any other thing here to proof notable than relationship with Portable. 7G🍁 (🪓) 11:31, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

7G🍁 I noticed that an article I worked on has been nominated for deletion.
Before drafting the article, I conducted a thorough search and found reliable sources from nationally recognized newspapers that verify the subject's notability. These sources provide substantial coverage, and I believe they meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
Elohothedon 19:17, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Elohothedon, can you provide these sources? Reading Beans 07:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Reading Beans References were included in the article. Elohothedon 07:40, 13 October 2024 (UTC) Thanks[reply]
@Elohothedon, this confirms that the coverage around him are mainly due to a conflict with Portable. Read about WP:BLP1E to familiarise yourself with the reason for nomination. Best, Reading Beans 07:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reading Beans@Reading Beans This is well noted. Elohothedon 15:01, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.