Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kritn ajitesh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete by TomStar81, CSD A7: Article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject. Also salted. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kritn ajitesh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have reworded some of the phrases so that this can escape a speedy deletion for being promotional. Still, there is no sign of meeting WP:NACTOR or any other SNG; looks like another Jack of all trades, master of none. This Forbes India is marked as paid for and the only other sources I could find were a blacklisted News Patrolling source and this which also have a strong smell of promo. I don't believe he meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG but if better sources are found, please ping me. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:05, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:05, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:05, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:05, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Per Spiderone's rationale, I too do not see how NACTOR &/ GNG are satisfied. Celestina007 (talk) 20:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Chance to give modification - I really don't know that this is one of the blacklisted News Patrolling source. And I am already mentioned that I don't have any connection with the person directly or indirectly. I just found few resources on him, and update the page with the resources. I Will not put any other so called Blacklisted site ever. Just give me a chance to modified the content once please. Thank you. Cyclopxx (talk) 2:00, 9 February 2021 (IST)

This discussion will last for at least seven days which should be more than enough time to find at least WP:THREE sources showing that he is notable Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete and salt – it is not a coincidence that Kritn Ajitesh is salted; see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kritn. --bonadea contributions talk 21:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and salt As per above explained for voilating wikipedia guidelines. Setreis (talk) 06:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per nom. RationalPuff (talk) 15:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as per nominator. Non notable actor. Niceguylucky (talk) 09:43, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - When the person's name is not capitalized properly in the article's title, be suspicious. His supporters tried to evade the WP:SALT process by screwing around with the title, and multiple times by the looks of it. Meanwhile, in fairness the guy has gotten some media coverage, but it is most likely paid promotions as pointed out by the nominator. Good luck to him on his promotional blitz, but Wikipedia will not be a part of it. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:21, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt undisclosed paid-for-spam. GSS ^💬 19:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and salt Undisclosed paid-for-spam per GSS. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 09:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The article creator has now declared their paid relationship with the subject. --bonadea contributions talk 16:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then it's disclosed paid-for spam now. :) GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 12:21, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yep :-) I just wanted to make it clear to any editors who might come to this discussion and only see the creator's claim that there was no payment involved. --bonadea contributions talk 19:32, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 21:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
wEaK spEedY deLETe pre n0m.--Alcremie (talk) 14:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
speedy delete and salt per Bonadea's comment above, and GSS. —usernamekiran (talk) 20:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.